Thursday, April 30, 2015



Aankhon mein zara dekho;
Toh Shaayad kuch samajh paaoge..
Palkon ke peeche zara dekho;
Toh khud ko paaoge..
Nazron ka yeh ajeeb khel hai;
Saamne woh nahi..
Phir bhi kareeb hai..
Par koi toh usko samjhaaon,
Woh paas hoke bhi,
Kambakht ek dhokhaa hai.

April 2015


Friday, August 22, 2014

Sidharth Returns

Sidharth Returns... Singham Ishtyle ;)

I could not think of a better heading to this post given the fact it has taken me 1.5 years getting back to the blogosphere, and all around you have the excitement of Singham Returning to the theaters. I loved the first part honestly, hope his returning is worth it. Mine is for sure! :)

Apologies to my regular followers for being away so long. Life isn't just about the blogosphere, and I guess last couple of years, life just reminded me that! But, I am glad life did that. You get to learn a lot, you get to understand the world better, and you get an altogether different meaning and perspective of how happy one can be. Happiness to me, is what I am today. All those who know me personally I guess know what I mean by that :)

Last few weeks I was building on the thought to get back to blog, but was just waiting for that topic/issue to make a comeback on. Lately, I have also been following signs which life gets in front of you, and it is upon you whether you follow them, leave alone just noticing them. Today, a random WhatsApp message from a friend (Shraddha) asking why have I stopped blogging, was the sign for me to return. I was overwhelmed that she actually remembered and missed the blog! That's when I knew, time to switch on my laptop, and start typing. And about what? Well, what better than announcing my return!

Seize the day. Carpe Diem!

I guess, this is it for this post. Do welcome me back with your comments! :)

Keywords: Sidharth Returns, Sidharth Mehta, Life, Motivation, Carpe Diem, Seize the day

Sunday, February 3, 2013

The Brilliant Amit Trivedi..

It seldom happens when a Music Director comes out with splendid tunes in each and every film of his... and each and every song of his!.... Amit Trivedi is one such musical specie... I have been following his music right from the beginning .. Aamir, Dev D, Wake Up Sid (Iktara), Udaan, Aisha, Ishaqzaade, Ek Main Aur Ek Tu, English Vinglish ... and now Kai Po Che.... 

Undoubtedly, amongst his best of works, the music puts life into the lyrics of the songs... I won't write much, rather would just let you get mesmerized with the songs ................ 

Manja | Kai Po Che 

Meethi Boliyan | Kai Po Che 

... Do post in your comments about how did you like the music...

Sid Mehta
Dubai - Feb 2013

Key Tags: Amit Trivedi Music, Kai Po Che, Lyrics, Brilliant Music, Chetan Bhagat, Sushant Singh Rajput, Abhishek Kapoor, Meethi Boliyan, Manja, Sid Mehta, Sidharth Mehta, Siddharth Mehta, Dubai

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Kingfisher - The King of Bad Times..

Quoting the Times of India, from this article:

...Kingfisher Airlines needs at least Rs 10 billion to restart its grounded operations and must also demonstrate an ability to sustain itself for at least 6 months, civil aviation minister Ajit Singh said on Tuesday. Earlier in the day, a senior government source said India was willing to support a rescue plan from Kingfisher if it could settle months of salary due to frustrated employees...

The Key Question: Does the government need to really help Kingfisher?
A simple and sweet answer to the above question is - "NO".

Flamboyant is an understatement when you have to describe the owner of Kingfisher Airlines - Mr. Vijay Mallya. The once upon a time - determined businessman who worked hard to build recognized brands such as the Kingfisher Beer, and buying out top notch liquor brands from around the World, is still seen posing with bikini clad models in a fashion calendar of his own company, leave aside attending many parties involving bollywood celebrities. If that is not enough, he is seen flying every second weekend for Formula 1 races in which he owns a British Racing Team with an Indian name!. There have been times recently where he simply disappeared from the public view (many assuming that he might be trying to clinch some deals to save Kingfisher Airlines), only to be found relaxing in his private yacht. 

Quite honestly, the above paragraph profiling Vijay Mallya is enough to take a decision why the government should not bail out Kingfisher Airlines. Anyhow, reasons to justify what I say above, are below....

- Kingfisher is a private company.
- It is bankrupt due to the faulty management by its owner and other top management executives. 

A Simple Solution
If the government really wants to help someone in the Kingfisher Airlines issue, it should be only the employees who are more frustrated than even the owner of this private airline. 

- As a goodwill gesture, the government could give 3-4 month’s salary to the employees of Kingfisher Airlines as compensation. I mean, if the government is willing to give 10 BN Rupees to bail out the Airline, instead why not simply give that money as compensation to the employees. The owner and top management, quite honestly deserve their Airline to be shut down, given their failure to run it properly as well as for the sheer ignorance and arrogance of the owner. 

- An even better solution would be to give jobs to all the employees of Kingfisher Airlines, and hire them within the government owned - Air India. The people of India in general are already fed up of the problematic service of Air India; add to that the Air India crew literally sucks in the air!. These Kingfisher Airlines employees could add value for Air India with their private airline experience and hospitality. All this could very well happen with the 10 BN rupees which the government is willing to give to the management of Kingfisher Airlines. 

All this, obviously, is possible only if our politicians will not think of the money they would like to transfer to their Swiss bank accounts.

In hope to fly the king of good times again....

dubai, Jan 2013.
Key Tags: Kingfisher Airlines, Government of India, Incredible India, Bankrupt, WTF, Ajit Singh, Vijay Mallya, Corruption, Times of India, Sidharth Mehta, Sid Mehta, Siddharth Mehta, dubai, infinity business school

Monday, January 21, 2013


The Times of India website's home page is nothing less than a joke. Have a look at the picture along... Their home page looked like this on 21st Jan 2013 around 9 AM UAE time (10:30 AM IST). 

Why not call their 'OTHER STORIES' section simply 'ENTERTAINMENT SECTION'?

Key Tags: Times of India, Pathetic Journalism, TOI, Jokes, Entertainment, Bollywood, Filmfare Awards, Incredible India, Sidharth Mehta, Sid Mehta, Dubai, Siddharth Mehta, Inbuss, Infinity Business School

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Brand Ambassador - Yash Chopra - Really??

I am surprised and shocked till what extent can companies go to market their products/services in India. Have a look at the above picture and the message in the advertisement of a website called healthmeup dot com. Just because Yash Chopra recently died due to dengue, does not give the right to any company to use his picture and start promoting their services to prevent that disease. It is unfortunate that Times of India has allowed the advertisement to go on their homepage.

I even have doubts that the website, healthmeup dot com could be part of the Times Group itself!.

Sidharth Mehta
Dubai, UAE
Key Tags: Yash Chopra Death, Dengue, Times of India,, pathetic journalism, commercial freedom, the great indian nightmare

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Nargis and Uday bond at Yash Chopra’s house

The Times of India has published this story on its website the day after the funeral of Uday Chopra's father - Yash Chopra. Have a read here: . Along with the story, they have also published a photograph which I am attaching to my blog post as well.

Yash Chopra would have really died again if he would have read this story!!. Such insensitivity shown by the newspaper and the photographer (from behind the bushes!!!) towards friends who have come to console a person who has lost his father.

Indeed, journalism takes a new low with this news item.

Sidharth Mehta
Dubai, UAE
Key Tags: Pathetic Journalism, Times of India, TOI, Uday Chopra and Nargis Fakhri, Hrithik Roshan, Yash Chopra, The Great Indian Nightmare, WTF!, Sid Mehta, Siddharth Mehta, Sidharth Mehta Dubai, Infinity Business School, Incredible India

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Pathetic Journalism - TOI - Rajasthanis stranded in Kuwait

Ok. First of all - apologies for being off the blogosphere for now almost 11 months! Things were genuinely busy, but no excuse for not able to do what I do best - express my thoughts on this blog.

I was reading through the Times of India website earlier today, and something which caught my attention was this news item on their cover page --- "Rajasthanis stranded in Kuwait; families urge state govt to intervene" mainly because of two reasons. First, I am a Rajasthani myself, and second, I live in the gulf as well (though not Kuwait, but in Dubai).

Read the first line itself of the article, and you would know that TOI has done what they do the best -- Blunders. "With the US-led attack on Iraq entered on the second day many Indians including Rajasthanis have been deported back to their respective homes.".

The article is trying to make us believe that the US-led war on IRAQ has entered the 2nd day now, which it actually did ages ago.

Going through the entire article you would know that it is about some visa issues of Indians in Kuwait (most of them Rajasthani's). My question is - How is Indians being detained in Kuwait due to visa issues have any sort of relation with the US led war on IRAQ???? 

I love reading the HINDU for news... but moments such as this, which gives me a lot of content to put for my own blog, I do not mind reading through the TOI website :) .

Key Tags: Pathetic Journalism Times of India, TOI, HINDU, Sidharth Mehta, Siddharth Mehta, Sid Mehta, Dubai, Blogger, Infinity Business School, Rajasthan, Kuwait, Iraq, US led war on Iraq

Thursday, September 15, 2011

The Evolution of a Pakistani Militant Network

The Evolution of a Pakistani Militant Network is republished with permission of STRATFOR.

By Sean Noonan and Scott Stewart

For many years now, STRATFOR has been carefully following the evolution of “Lashkar-e-Taiba” (LeT), the name of a Pakistan-based jihadist group that was formed in 1990 and existed until about 2001, when it was officially abolished. In subsequent years, however, several major attacks were attributed to LeT, including the November 2008 coordinated assault in Mumbai, India. Two years before that attack we wrote that the group, or at least its remnant networks, were nebulous but still dangerous. This nebulous nature was highlighted in November 2008 when the “Deccan Mujahideen,” a previously unknown group, claimed responsibility for the Mumbai attacks.

While the most famous leaders of the LeT networks, Hafiz Mohammad Saeed and Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi, are under house arrest and in jail awaiting trial, respectively, LeT still poses a significant threat. It’s a threat that comes not so much from LeT as a single jihadist force but LeT as a concept, a banner under which various groups and individuals can gather, coordinate and successfully conduct attacks.

Such is the ongoing evolution of the jihadist movement. And as this movement becomes more diffuse, it is important to look at brand-name jihadist groups like LeT, al Qaeda, the Haqqani network and Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan as loosely affiliated networks more than monolithic entities. With a debate under way between and within these groups over who to target and with major disruptions of their operations by various military and security forces, the need for these groups to work together in order to carry out sensational attacks has become clear. The result is a new, ad hoc template for jihadist operations that is not easily defined and even harder for government leaders to explain to their constituents and reporters to explain to their readers.

Thus, brand names like Lashkar-e-Taiba (which means Army of the Pure) will continue to be used in public discourse while the planning and execution of high-profile attacks grows ever more complex. While the threat posed by these networks to the West and to India may not be strategic, the possibility of disparate though well-trained militants working together and even with organized-crime elements does suggest a continuing tactical threat that is worth examining in more detail.

The Network Formerly Known as Lashkar-e-Taiba

The history of the group of militants and preachers who created LeT and their connections with other groups helps us understand how militant groups develop and work together. Markaz al-Dawa wal-Irshad (MDI) and its militant wing, LeT, was founded with the help of transnational militants based in Afghanistan and aided by the Pakistani government. This allowed it to become a financially-independent social-service organization that was able to divert a significant portion of its funding to its militant wing.

The first stirrings of militancy within this network began in 1982, when Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi traveled from Punjab, Pakistan, to Paktia, Afghanistan, to fight with Deobandi militant groups. Lakhvi, who is considered to have been the military commander of what was known as LeT and is awaiting trial for his alleged role in the 2008 Mumbai attacks, adheres to an extreme version of the Ahl-e-Hadith (AeH) interpretation of Islam, which is the South Asian version of the Salafist-Wahhabist trend in the Arab world. In the simplest of terms, AeH is more conservative and traditional than the doctrines of most militant groups operating along the Durand Line. Militants there tend to follow an extreme brand of the Deobandi branch of South Asian Sunni Islam, similar to the extreme ideology of al Qaeda’s Salafist jihadists.

Lakhvi created his own AeH-inspired militant group in 1984, and a year later two academics, Hafiz Mohammad Saeed and Zafar Iqbal, created Jamaat ul-Dawa, an Islamist AeH social organization. Before these groups were formed there was already a major AeH political organization called Jamaat AeH, led by the most well-known Pakistani AeH scholar, the late Allama Ehsan Elahi Zaheer, who was assassinated in Lahore in 1987. His death allowed Saeed and Lakhvi’s movement to take off. It is important to note that AeH adherents comprise a very small percentage of Pakistanis and that those following the movement launched by Saeed and Lakhvi represent only a portion of those who ascribe to AeH’s ideology.

In 1986, Saeed and Lakhvi joined forces, creating Markaz al-Dawa wal-Irshad (MDI) in Muridke, near Lahore, Pakistan. MDI had 17 founders, including Saeed and Lakhvi as well as transnational militants originally from places like Saudi Arabia and the Palestinian territories. While building facilities in Muridke for social services, MDI also established its first militant training camp in Paktia, then another in Kunar, Afghanistan, in 1987. Throughout the next three decades, these camps often were operated in cooperation with other militant groups, including al Qaeda.

MDI was established to accomplish two related missions. The first involved peaceful, above-board activities like medical care, education, charitable work and proselytizing. Its second and equally important mission was military jihad, which the group considered obligatory for all Muslims. The group first fought in Afghanistan along with Jamaat al-Dawa al-Quran wal-Suna, a hardline Salafist group that shared MDI’s ideology. Jamil al-Rahman, the group’s leader at the time, provided support to MDI’s first militant group and continued to work with MDI until his death in 1987.

The deaths of al-Rahman and Jamaat AeH leader Allama Ehsan Elahi Zaheer in 1987 gave the leaders of the nascent MDI the opportunity to supplant Jamaat al-Dawa al-Quran wal-Suna and Jamaat AeH and grow quickly.

In 1990, the growing MDI officially launched LeT as its militant wing under the command of Lakhvi, while Saeed remained emir of the overall organization. This was when LeT first began to work with other groups operating in Kashmir, since the Soviets had left Afghanistan and many of the foreign mujahideen there were winding down their operations. In 1992, when the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan was finally defeated, many foreign militants who had fought in Afghanistan left to fight in other places like Kashmir. LeT is also known to have sent fighters to Bosnia-Herzegovina and Tajikistan, but Kashmir became the group’s primary focus.

MDI/LeT explained its concentration on Kashmir by arguing that it was the closest Muslim territory that was occupied by non-believers. Since MDI/LeT was a Punjabi entity, Kashmir was also the most accessible theater of jihad for the group. Due to the group’s origin and the history of the region, Saeed and other members also bore personal grudges against India. In the 1990s, MDI/LeT also received substantial support from the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence directorate (ISI) and military, which had its own interest in supporting operations in Kashmir. At this point, MDI/LeT developed relations with other groups operating in Kashmir, such as Hizb-ul-Mujahideen, Harkat-ul-Jihad e-Islami and Jaish-e-Mohammad. Unlike these groups, however, MDI/LeT was considered easier to control because its AeH sect of Islam was not very large and did not have the support of the main AeH groups. With Pakistan’s support came certain restraints, and many LeT trainees said that as part of their indoctrination into the group they were made to promise never to attack Pakistan.

LeT expanded its targeting beyond Kashmir to the rest of India in 1992, after the destruction of the Babri Masjid mosque during communal rioting in Uttar Pradesh state, and similar unrest in Mumbai and Gujarat. LeT sent Azam Cheema, who Saeed and Iqbal knew from their university days, to recruit fighters in India. Indian militants from a group called Tanzim Islahul Muslimeen were recruited into LeT, which staged its first major attack with five coordinated improvised explosive devices (IEDs) on trains in Mumbai and Hyderabad on Dec. 5-6, 1993, the first anniversary of the destruction of the Babri Masjid mosque. These are the first attacks in non-Kashmir India that can be linked to LeT. The group used Tanzim Islahul Muslimeen networks in the 1990s and later developed contacts with the Student Islamic Movement of India and its offshoot militant group the Indian Mujahideen.

The Student Islamic Movement of India/Indian Mujahideen network was useful in recruiting and co-opting operatives, but it is a misconception to think these indigenous Indian groups worked directly for LeT. In some cases, Pakistanis from LeT provided IED training and other expertise to Indian militants who carried out attacks, but these groups, while linked to the LeT network, maintained their autonomy. The most recent attacks in India — Sept. 7 in Delhi and July 13 in Mumbai — probably have direct ties to these networks.

Between 1993 and 1995, LeT received its most substantial state support from Pakistan, which helped build up LeT’s military capability by organizing and training its militants and providing weapons, equipment, campaign guidance and border-crossing support in Pakistan-administered Kashmir. LeT operated camps on both sides of the Afghan-Pakistani border as well as in Kashmir, in places like Muzaffarabad.

At the same time, MDI built up a major social-services network, building schools and hospitals and setting up charitable foundations throughout Pakistan, though centered in Punjab. Its large complex in Muridke included schools, a major hospital and a mosque. Some of its funding came through official Saudi channels while other funding came through non-official channels via Saudi members of MDI such as Abdul Rahman al-Surayhi and Mahmoud Mohammad Ahmed Bahaziq, who reportedly facilitated much of the funding to establish the original Muridke complex.

As MDI focused on dawah, or the preaching of Islam, it simultaneously developed an infrastructure that was financially self-sustaining. For example, it established Al-Dawah schools throughout Pakistan that charged fees to those who could afford it and it began taxing its adherents. It also became well-known for its charitable activities, placing donation boxes throughout Pakistan. The group developed a reputation as an efficient organization that provides quality social services, and this positive public perception has made it difficult for the Pakistani government to crack down on it.

On July 12, 1999, LeT carried out its first fidayeen, or suicide commando, attack in Kashmir. Such attacks focus on inflicting as much damage as possible before the attackers are killed. Their goal also was to engender as much fear as possible and introduce a new intensity to the conflict there. This attack occurred during the Kargil war, when Pakistani soldiers along with its sponsored militants fought a pitched battle against Indian troops in the Kargil district of Kashmir. This was the height of Pakistani state support for the various militant groups operating in Kashmir, and it was a critical, defining period for the LeT, which shifted its campaign from one focused exclusively on Kashmir to one focused on India as a whole.

State support for LeT and other militant groups declined after the Kargil war but fidayeen attacks continued and began to occur outside of Kashmir. In the late 1990s and into the 2000s, there was much debate within LeT about its targeting. When LeT was constrained operationally in Kashmir by its ISI handlers, some members of the group wanted to conduct attacks in other places. It’s unclear at this point which attacks had Pakistani state support and which did not, but the timing of many in relation to the ebb and flow of the Pakistani-Indian political situation indicates Pakistani support and control, even if it came only from factions within the ISI or military. The first LeT attack outside of Kashmir took place on Dec. 22, 2000, against the Red Fort in Delhi.

The Post-9/11 Name Game

In the months following 9/11, many Pakistan-based jihadist groups were “banned” by the Pakistani government. They were warned beforehand and moved their funds into physical assets or under different names. LeT claimed that it split with MDI, with new LeT leader Maula Abdul Wahid al-Kashmiri saying the group now was strictly a Kashmiri militant organization. Despite these claims, however, Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi was still considered supreme commander. MDI was dissolved and replaced by Jamaat-ul-Dawa, the original name used by Saeed and Iqbal’s group. Notably, both al-Kashmiri and Lakhvi were also part of the Jamaat-ul-Dawa executive board, indicating that close ties remained between the two groups.

In January 2002, LeT was declared illegal, and the Pakistani government began to use the word “defunct” to describe it. In reality it wasn’t defunct; it had begun merely operating under different names. The group’s capability to carry out attacks was temporarily limited, probably on orders from the Pakistani government through Jamaat-ul-Dawa’s leadership.

At this point, LeT’s various factions began to split and re-network in various ways. For example, Abdur Rehman Syed, a senior operational planner involved in David Headley’s surveillance of Mumbai targets, left LeT around 2004. As a major in the Pakistani army he had been ordered to fight fleeing Taliban on the Durand Line in 2001. He refused and joined LeT. In 2004 he began working with Ilyas Kashmiri and Harkat-ul-Jihad e-Islami. Two other senior LeT leaders, former Pakistani Maj. Haroon Ashiq and his brother Capt. Kurram Ashiq, had left Pakistan’s Special Services Group to join LeT around 2001. By 2003 they had exited the group and were criticizing Lakhvi, the former LeT military commander.

Despite leaving the larger organization, former members of the MDI/LeT still often use the name “Lashkar-e-Taiba” in their public rhetoric when describing their various affiliations, even though they do not consider their new organizations to be offshoots of LeT. The same difficulties observers face in trying to keep track of these spun-off factions has come to haunt the factions themselves, which have a branding problem as they try to raise money or recruit fighters. New names don’t have the same power as the well-established LeT brand, and many of the newer organizations continue to use the LeT moniker in some form.

Operating Outside of South Asia

Organizations and networks that were once part of LeT have demonstrated the capability to carry out insurgent attacks in Afghanistan, small-unit attacks in Kashmir, fidayeen assaults in Kashmir and India and small IED attacks throughout the region. Mumbai in 2008 was the most spectacular attack by an LeT offshoot on an international scale, but to date the network has not demonstrated the capability to conduct complex attacks outside the region. That said, David Headley’s surveillance efforts in Denmark and other plots linked to LeT training camps and factions do seem to have been inspired by al Qaeda’s transnational jihadist influence.

To date, these operations have failed, but they are worth noting. These transnational LeT-linked plotters include the following:

  • The Virginia Jihad Network.
  • Dhiren Barot (aka Abu Eisa al-Hind), a Muslim convert of Indian origin who grew up in the United Kingdom, was arrested there in 2004 and was accused of a 2004 plot to detonate vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices in underground parking lots and surveilling targets in the United States in 2000-2001 for al Qaeda. He originally learned his craft in LeT training camps in Pakistan.
  • David Hicks, an Australian who was in LeT camps in 1999 and studied at one of their madrassas. LeT provided a letter of introduction to al Qaeda, which he joined in January 2001. He was captured in Afghanistan following the U.S.-led invasion.
  • Omar Khyam of the United Kingdom, who attended LeT training camps in 2000 before his family brought him home.
  • The so-called “Crevice Network,” members of which were arrested in 2004 and charged with attempting to build fertilizer-based IEDs in the United Kingdom under the auspices of al Qaeda.
  • Willie Brigette, who had been connected to LeT networks in France and was trying to contact a bombmaker in Australia in order to carry out attacks there when he was arrested in October 2003.

While these cases suggest that the LeT threat persists, they also indicate that the transnational threat posed by those portions of the network focused on attacks outside of South Asia does not appear to be as potent as the attack in Mumbai in 2008. One reason is the Pakistani support offered to those who focus on operations in South Asia and particularly those who target India. Investigations of the Mumbai attack revealed that current or former ISI officers provided a considerable amount of training, operational support and even real-time guidance to the Mumbai attack team.

It is unclear how far up the Pakistani command structure this support goes. The most important point, though, is that Pakistani support in the Mumbai attack provided the group responsible with capabilities that have not been demonstrated by other parts of the network in other plots. In fact, without this element of state support, many transnational plots linked to the LeT network have been forced to rely on the same kind of “Kramer jihadists” in the West that the al Qaeda core has employed in recent years.

However, while these networks have not shown the capability to conduct a spectacular attack since Mumbai, they continue to plan. With both the capability and intention in place, it is probably only a matter of time before they conduct additional attacks in India. The historical signature of LeT attacks has been the use of armed assault tactics — taught originally by the ISI and institutionalized by LeT doctrine — so attacks of this sort can be expected. An attack of this sort outside of South Asia would be a stretch for the groups that make up the post-LeT networks, but the cross-pollination that is occurring among the various jihadist actors in Pakistan could help facilitate planning and even operations if they pool resources. Faced with the full attention of global counterterrorism efforts, such cooperation may be one of the only ways that the transnational jihad can hope to gain any traction, especially as its efforts to foster independent grassroots jihadists have been largely ineffective.

The Evolution of a Pakistani Militant Network is republished with permission of STRATFOR.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Photo: India-Pakistan Border From Space


See the orange line? This is what the border between Pakistan and India, floodlit for surveillance purposes, looks like at night, from space.

The bundles of light in the photo, which was taken from north to south, are the following cities: Delhi (top center), Srinagar (left), Lahore (center, just below the border line), and Islamabad (bottom center.)

The picture, taken by the International Space Station’s Expedition 28 crew, was shot on Aug. 21 and recently released

Sid Mehta
Dubai, UAE
India Pakistan Border from Space, Incredible India, India Pakistan Relations, Sid Mehta,
Siddharth Mehta, Sidharth Mehta, Blog,

Share This

Share |


Related Posts with Thumbnails
Copyright Sidharth Mehta (This work by Sidharth is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 India License)

DISCLAIMER: This is a personal blog. The opinions expressed here are my own and not of my employer, or those who have a link to this blog, or of my mom, dad, brother, uncle, aunt, grandparents, and any other blood relations. Also, since I am a normal human being, having an open mind, my opinions and thoughts change time to time. The intent of this blog is to provide a temporary snapshot and overview of various thoughts running around in my brain, and therefore a lot of written stuff on the blog which is of a past date or time, may not be the same, or even similar to what I might think today or at present.

You are free to challenge or disagree with me, or tell me I’m completely insane, by posting on the comments section of each blog entry, but I, and only I, keep the right to delete any comment for any reason whatsoever. The reason for deletion,if done so, shall be posted on the comments section where the comment was posted originally.

This blog might also knowingly or unknowingly link to content that could be obscene, useless, useful, hate-filled, scary, wonderful, harmful, bad, good, etc. In no way, Sidharth Mehta or his blog condemn, is responsible, or endorses such content.